<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Industrial Law Journal - current issue</title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Industrial Law Journal - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1464-3669</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>June 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Industrial Law Journal</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0305-9332</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/169?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/178?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/188?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/189?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Obituary]]></title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Higgins, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwn007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Obituary]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Industrial Law Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>125</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>OBITUARY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? The Viking and Laval Cases in the ECJ]]></title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article analyses the judgements of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Case C-438/05 <I>International Transport Workers&rsquo; Federation and Finnish Seamen's Union v Viking Line</I> (Judgement 11 December 2007) and Case C-341/05 <I>Laval v Svenska Byggnadsarbetaref&ouml;rbundet</I> (Judgement 18 December 2007). In these cases, the ECJ held that where industrial action infringes an employer's free movement rights under Article 43 EC (freedom of establishment) and Article 49 EC (freedom to provide services), respectively, these Treaty provisions can have horizontal direct effect against the unions organizing the action. Unions may defend themselves against these claims by asserting a right to strike (which the Court recognized as a fundamental right within Community law) but only where they are acting proportionately in the exercise of that right. The article explores the key elements of the ECJ's decisions on direct effect, fundamental rights and proportionality, and draws out some of the implications of these cases for English law.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davies, A. C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwn001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? The Viking and Laval Cases in the ECJ]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Industrial Law Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Privatization of Wrongful Dismissal Protection in Comparative Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The US Supreme Court has allowed employers to sweep employee claims of violation of most labour protective law into arbitration systems that employers unilaterally establish. The law would not allow employers in the UK, France or Germany to do so. This essay explores how and why that is so in each of these countries. It explains the US exceptionalism by reference to public choice theory, ie, by resort to the economics of judicial shirking.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Finkin, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwn002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Privatization of Wrongful Dismissal Protection in Comparative Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Industrial Law Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>168</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/169?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The 'Right' to Object to Transfer of Employment under TUPE]]></title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/169?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mcmullen, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwn003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The 'Right' to Object to Transfer of Employment under TUPE]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Industrial Law Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>169</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/178?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Protecting Agency Workers: Implied Contract or Legislation?]]></title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/178?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwn004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Protecting Agency Workers: Implied Contract or Legislation?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Industrial Law Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/188?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards a Flexible Labour Market: Labour Legislation and Regulation since the 1990s]]></title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/188?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwn005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards a Flexible Labour Market: Labour Legislation and Regulation since the 1990s]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Industrial Law Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>189</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/189?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EU Intervention in Domestic Labour Law]]></title>
<link>http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/2/189?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenner, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/indlaw/dwn006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EU Intervention in Domestic Labour Law]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Industrial Law Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>191</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>189</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEWS</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>